Key Takeaways

  • LINK, the robot sent to save NASA's falling Swift telescope, started spinning in late July after an electrical fault knocked out two of its three reaction wheels
  • Engineers have cut the spin from nine degrees a second to four using LINK's thrusters, and the spacecraft is still powered and talking to the ground
  • The rendezvous with Swift has slipped from early August to late August at the earliest
  • Swift must stay above roughly 300km for a rescue to work, and it's expected to fall below that line this autumn — so the margin is thin but not gone
  • NASA administrator Jared Isaacman says the agency is 'not giving up yet'

Swift Rescue Mission Update: What's Gone Wrong

The mission sent to rescue a falling space telescope now needs rescuing itself.

LINK, the fridge-sized robot that finally launched on 3 July after three scrubbed attempts, started spinning in orbit in late July. An electrical power fault knocked out two of its three reaction wheels, the devices that control which way the spacecraft points. At its worst, LINK was rotating at nine degrees a second. That's a full turn every 40 seconds, which is no state for a spacecraft that needs to creep up on a telescope and grab it.

The good news: the spin is coming down. By 30 July, careful thruster firings had cut it to four degrees a second, and Katalyst's engineers are still working to stop it completely. NASA says LINK remains "power positive and in communication" with the ground. In other words, wounded but very much alive.

NASA administrator Jared Isaacman summed up the mood on X: "We are not giving up yet. This remains a very cool, very low-cost, high-potential, high-reward mission."

Illustration of the LINK spacecraft rotating in orbit with two of its three reaction wheels highlighted as failed
Two of LINK's three reaction wheels failed after an electrical fault, leaving the spacecraft slowly tumbling. Thruster firings have halved the spin rate so far.

Reaction wheels are the unsung heroes of spaceflight. They're heavy flywheels that spin up and slow down inside a spacecraft, and by Newton's third law the spacecraft turns the other way. No fuel needed, just electricity. Most satellites carry three or four so they can point precisely in any direction.

LINK carries three. Over the weekend of 26–27 July, a problem in the power system took two of them offline and left the spacecraft's cold-gas fine-control thrusters only partly working. With nothing holding it steady, LINK began to tumble.

Katalyst's fix has two parts. First, stop the spin using the thrusters that still work, which is slow, careful work because every firing has to be timed against the rotation. Second, rewrite the guidance and control software so LINK can fly its mission on one wheel plus thrusters. Neither is impossible. Spacecraft have limped home on less: Kepler famously kept planet-hunting for years after losing two of its four wheels.

Engineers at Katalyst mission control watching telemetry screens showing the LINK spacecraft's rotation rate
Katalyst's team spent the last days of July nursing LINK's spin down from nine degrees a second to four.

Late August at the earliest. The original timeline had LINK arriving near Swift about a month after launch, so early August. The spin recovery has pushed that back by several weeks, and NASA says teams will only "evaluate revised plans to approach and capture Swift" once LINK is stable and healthy.

That schedule slip matters more on this mission than most, because the target won't wait.

Swift's neighbourhood, from your garden

Kit we've tested and reviewed in full

Swift and LINK are circling in the same busy band of sky where satellites catch the sun after dusk. On a clear August evening a pair of binoculars will show you dozens of them drifting between the stars.

Best all-rounder

Opticron Adventurer 10×50

4.7Our full review

Wide field, bright view, easy to hold steady. Ideal for picking up a moving satellite and following it across the sky.

~£84
Buy at FLO
More reach

Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15×70

4.5Our full review

The big 70mm lenses pull in fainter satellites and give you the summer Milky Way as a bonus. Rest them on a wall or tripod.

~£229
Buy at FLO
Browse all our binocular reviews →

Affiliate links: you pay the same price — we earn a small commission that helps keep WatchTheStars free.

Can NASA Still Save the Swift Telescope?

Yes, but the margin is getting uncomfortably thin.

Swift has been sinking for months, dragged down by an upper atmosphere swollen by the solar maximum. The 22-year-old telescope has already fallen from its original 600km orbit to around 400km. For a rescue to work, NASA's models say Swift must stay above a minimum altitude of roughly 300km (about 185 miles). For comparison, the International Space Station flies at about 400km.

The models expect Swift to drop below that rescue line this autumn. A late-August rendezvous still fits inside that window, but only just, and the lower Swift sinks the faster it falls. The telescope is doing its bit to buy time: it has cut back its science observations to fly as streamlined as possible and reduce drag.

So the race is now genuinely tight on both ends. LINK needs to get healthy quickly, and Swift needs to hold on a little longer.

NASA's Swift Observatory in low orbit above the glowing blue haze of Earth's upper atmosphere
Swift has sunk from 600km to around 400km. Below roughly 300km, no rescue is possible.

What Happens Next in the Swift Boost Mission

Watch for three milestones over the next few weeks.

First, Katalyst needs to announce that LINK's spin has stopped and the spacecraft is stable. Second, the updated control software has to prove it can point LINK accurately on one wheel and thrusters. Third, NASA and Katalyst will publish a revised rendezvous date, and from there the plan runs as before: two to three weeks studying Swift up close, then the capture with LINK's three robotic arms, then months of gentle pushing with ion thrusters to raise the telescope back towards 600km.

If it all comes off, LINK still becomes the first private spacecraft to capture a US government satellite, and NASA gets its gamma-ray burst hunter back for a fraction of the cost of a replacement. If the delays stretch into September, the sums start to look grim.

The best sources for updates are NASA's Swift blog and Katalyst's mission page. We've followed this mission since the rescue was first announced, and we'll cover the next chapter here, whichever way it goes.


Sources:

Frequently Asked Questions

The LINK spacecraft, launched on 3 July 2026 to catch and reboost NASA's falling Swift telescope, began spinning in orbit in late July. An electrical power fault disabled two of its three reaction wheels, the spinning flywheels a spacecraft uses to control which way it points. Katalyst's engineers have used LINK's thrusters to slow the spin from nine degrees a second to four, and work to stabilise it fully is ongoing.
No. NASA says LINK remains 'power positive' — generating more electricity than it uses — and is in regular contact with Katalyst's team. The spin is being brought under control. The plan is to stop the rotation, update LINK's control software to fly on one reaction wheel plus thrusters, and then head for Swift.
Late August 2026 at the earliest. The original plan had LINK arriving about a month after its 3 July launch, but the spin recovery has eaten several weeks. NASA and Katalyst will set a firmer date once the spacecraft is stable and checked out.
It's going to be close. Swift must stay above a minimum rescue altitude of roughly 300km (about 185 miles) for a reboost to remain possible, and NASA's models expect it to fall below that line in the autumn. Current predictions leave room for a late-August rendezvous, but there is very little spare time left.
The Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory has been NASA's rapid-response eye on the violent universe for nearly 22 years. It catches gamma-ray bursts — the flashes from collapsing stars and colliding neutron stars — within seconds and tells other telescopes where to look. Losing it would leave a real gap in astronomy, which is why NASA is spending $30 million trying to save it.
LINK is a fridge-sized robot built by Katalyst Space Technologies in under a year, for about $30 million. Its job is to grab Swift with three robotic arms and gently push it from around 400km back up towards its original 600km orbit. If it succeeds, it will be the first private spacecraft ever to capture a US government satellite.

Ian Clayton

About Ian Clayton

Amateur astronomer and founder of WatchTheStars.co.uk, dedicated to helping others explore the wonders of our universe.

View Full Profile →
← Back to Blog