UAP/UFO Research

Evidence-Based Investigation of Unexplained Aerial Phenomena

Exploring documented encounters, declassified government files, and scientific analysis of UAP cases. We present the facts, examine the evidence, and let you draw your own conclusions.

Our Approach to UAP Research

We maintain a balanced, evidence-based approach to UAP research. Our coverage focuses on well-documented cases with official records, credible witnesses, and verifiable evidence. We present both conventional and unconventional explanations, allowing readers to evaluate the data for themselves.

📂 Explore the UAP Document Archive

We hold and are working through nearly 29GB of official government UAP files: the 2026 US DoD PURSUE releases, the UK MOD X-files, and the Brazilian Varginha and Operação Prato records. Our archive hub explains what's in each collection and links every analysis we've published so far.

Browse the document archive →

UAP Cases

From the Blog

The latest UAP news, document releases, and ongoing investigations

Scan the skies for yourself

Kit we've tested and reviewed in full

Almost every UAP report in these files began with someone looking up. If you want to check the sky rather than take anyone's word for it, this is the kit that separates a satellite, a planet or a Starlink train from something you can't explain. See our binocular reviews for more.

Identify what you see

Opticron Adventurer 10×50

4.7Full review

A 10×50 resolves a star from a satellite, shows Jupiter's moons and Venus's phase, and settles most sightings in ten seconds.

~£84
Buy at FLO
More reach

Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15×70

4.5Full review

Big 70mm lenses for tracking a slow-moving light across the sky. Use a tripod.

~£229
Buy at FLO
Record it

ZWO Seestar S50

4.5Full review

A smart telescope that tracks and records what it sees, so a sighting comes with footage rather than a memory.

~£539
Buy at FLO

Browse all our equipment reviews

Honest, research-based recommendations for every budget.

Browse all →

Affiliate links: you pay the same price, we earn a small commission that helps keep WatchTheStars free.

About Our UAP Coverage

Watch The Stars has expanded beyond traditional astronomy to include evidence-based coverage of unexplained aerial phenomena. We believe that serious investigation of UAP encounters deserves the same rigorous, scientific approach we apply to astronomical research.

Our UAP research focuses exclusively on well-documented cases with verifiable evidence, official records, and credible witnesses. We present multiple perspectives and let the evidence speak for itself.

Frequently Asked Questions

They describe the same thing, but UAP is the term now used officially. UFO carries decades of cultural baggage that tends to imply alien craft, whereas Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena is deliberately neutral: it says only that something was seen and not identified. The US government moved to UAP in official reporting for exactly that reason.
No. There is no confirmed physical evidence that any UAP has an extraterrestrial origin, and no government has produced any. What the declassified record does show is a long history of encounters that trained observers and military sensors could not explain at the time. Unexplained is not the same as alien, and the gap between those two words is where most of the interesting work sits.
Yes. The files covered on this site come from official releases by the US Department of Defense, the CIA, the FBI, the UK Ministry of Defence and the National Archives, obtained through declassification programmes and Freedom of Information requests. We link to the primary documents wherever they are publicly hosted so you can read them yourself rather than take our word for it.
Rendlesham Forest in December 1980 is the one most often put forward in the UK, because it involved US Air Force personnel stationed at RAF Woodbridge, reported physical trace evidence, and generated official military documentation. The 2004 USS Nimitz encounter is its American counterpart, backed by radar returns and cockpit footage the Pentagon later confirmed as genuine. Credible here means well documented, not explained.
Start with what was actually recorded rather than what was concluded. Ask who the witnesses were, whether any instrument independently registered the object, how soon the account was written down, and whether ordinary explanations such as aircraft, balloons, satellites or Venus were properly ruled out. Most reports fall apart on one of those questions, and the small number that do not are the ones worth your time.

Get weekly sky highlights and UAP news

One email a week. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.